I had _never_ heard this before about Nikons. It wasn't meant as a criticism on Scott, nor a Canon vs. Only the D90 is still listed on Nikon's page (and they do list it's base ISO at 200). Ok - sounds like the bodies that have a base ISO of 200 are all fairly old and no longer marketed. Why would he claim Nikon's base ISO is 200? Is there something about Nikon that makes 200 better than using 100 or did I just get unusually lucky that the four sample cameras I checked all happened to be ISO 100? A D800 is a brand new body, but I picked the D3x, D7000, and D5100 because they've been out for several years. In the 'Tech Specs' section of each camera, Nikon consistently said the standard base ISO for all of these bodies was ISO 100. So then I hopped over to the Nikon website and looked up a sampling of cameras.

I had to back up the video and play it again just to make sure I didn't mis-hear what he said. But Scott Kelby is a Nikon shooter and typically not prone to make basic mistakes like this. If ANYONE ELSE had made this comment, I'd have assumed they misspoke. That's paraphrasing, but it caught me by surprise. For most Nikon owners, that'll be ISO 200.

and you need to shoot at your lowest possible ISO. At one point in the video, Scott makes the following comment (and I'll have to paraphrase because I don't recall word for word): I was watching a Scott Kelby video on long exposure shooting (with ND filters). I'm a Canon shooter (as most of you know), so I'm invading your Nikon forum to ask this.

Iso camera